.

U Weekly. Serving The Ohio State University in Columbus Ohio

Don't Miss

Bring On the Bacon

Uweekly Print

January 27th, 2010 Archives

Go Favre yourself

By VR Bryant

So did the Vikes!!!!! No Superbowl 40+ Years and counting. ahhhhhh
8 Comments + Add Yours

Already spiraling out of control, it seems, is the veritable sh-tstorm of bile and hatred for Brett Favre. With the Vikings' season coming to a crushing end, at least in some part because of a classic Favre miscue, all the most vociferous of Favre's detractors are out in full force. But then, are we surprised? One man only identified as "Rob" posted the following on the official Vikings blog:

"Favre jersey: $180

Airfare to New Orleans: $345

Ticket to NFC championship game: $850

Rooting for the man you spent 16 yrs hating: $(your soul)

Watching Favre throw an interception at the end of the game and dash your superbowl [sic] dreams ... PRICELESS"

Priceless indeed. There are so many legitimate and defensible positions on Favre at this point, that just about everyone between the ages of 15 and 75 in this country has some kind of opinion on the matter. Can you blame certain Vikings fans for feeling let down? One could certainly argue that Favre's interception was one of the team's less impactful gaffes on the day, yet the walls echo with people screaming "VINTAGE FAVRE" - and rightly so.

For the Vikings fans who want Favre back, who can fault them? The acquisition of number four was the only significant personnel change from a year ago, and the team winds up having its most successful season in more than a decade. They can see that if you took away just a couple of the freak turnovers committed by Adrian Peterson, Percy Harvin and Bernard Berrian, the game might have ended differently. The 40-year-old Favre just had arguably his best season as a pro. Who's to say they couldn't be there again with him next year?

I can also identify with the average football fan who has no real horse in the race (say, Browns fans) who were made to loathe the very mention of the man because of the media's constant and senseless reporting and tabloid portrayal of his clear resistance to true retirement.

For me, a kid who grew up looking at Favre as everything from a friend to a father figure, a kid who used to cry every year when the Packers would lose to the Cowboys in the playoffs, a grown man who got misty when Favre came off Soldier Field at the end of the 2006 season looking completely spent - for me, it's an amazing mélange of emotion. I'm happy and sad that he failed. I want him to come back and I don't. Mostly, with the beating he took on Sunday, I just don't want him to wind up in a wheelchair.

What we know to be true is that, regardless of what Favre says at this point regarding his future - if he chooses to say anything at all - we will all find ourselves enraptured by the story and the legacy, and so we should be. It's polarizing, sure. Some people love him and some people have come to hate him. You can say that about a lot of legends. It doesn't make them any less iconic.

The numbers are undeniable. He's first in everything that matters (yes, interceptions too), now including career playoff passing yards. He has his three MVP awards and his Super Bowl ring. I didn't buy that malarkey he was spewing, by the way, about having to remind people that he played in a Super Bowl. You can't watch a promo for the game without seeing a clip of the spritely young Favre sprinting across the field with his helmet off (the 15 yard unsportsmanlike conduct will be assessed on the kickoff) after tossing that strike to Andre Rison.

But so long as he is part of the national consciousness and his name is being bandied about in the rumor mill, we had all better just get used to hearing about it. It became hip at some point, the excessive groaning and eye-rolling at the mere mention of the "F-word," but I think we've come out the other side. He has proven that he can still play, and play well. No one can deny that. And maybe - just maybe - if we fans and media simply move on, then perhaps he will too.

Of course, some part of me (a very small and shameful part, mind you) is right now envisioning Favre shuffling around his back yard in Mississippi next winter, tossing beat-up footballs through a beat-up tire, with Packers coach Mike McCarthy sauntering up behind him, working up the gumption to ask the old man to call the signals just one last time because Aaron Rodgers separated his throwing shoulder lifting a bus off a basket of kittens. But that's just me.

Originally Published: January 27, 2010

↑ Back to the top
 
Comments
  1. Thank you for this article. Many people have jumped on the “hate” Brett Favre bandwagon although they never followed the Packers or really know anything about the man. They jumped on simply because hating him is fun. They hate him because they read and regurgitate the formulated facts espoused by the so called bloggers and journalists who believe that having a forum means having the right to do everything possible to destroy a man’s reputation.
    I am a Wisconsin born Packers fan who watched closely as the relationship between Brett and the team disintegrated. Only 3 years ago, Brett Favre was revered by Green Bay fans. Yes, his annual flirtation with retirement had become an expected rite of passage, but football is not a sissyÂ’s sport; anyone would think about retirement after being pummeled year after year. How many boxers have flirted, retired, and returned.
    Somehow, indecision has made him a hated man. Somehow playing football in Minnesota has made him a hated man with the fans he called his extended family for sixteen years. I have read some of the comments on the Vikings Blog and I am astonished by how many of the fans want him to return despite that heartbreaking pass. Yes, part of their motivation may be another chance at the Super Bowl, but after one year they have shown this man more respect and loyalty than most of the Packer fans.
    We are a throw-away society. Packer’s management threw Brett Favre aside because they wanted to rebuild. The rebuilding is understandable because Aaron Rogers has a monster arm. However, rather than show an ounce of loyalty toward their veteran quarterback, they decided the best way to get rid of the prior year’s “SI Sportsman of the Year”, whose image in and out of the locker room was unquestioned, was to hire a political publicist to destroy it. After which, he was labeled selfish, egotistical, and many other negative adjectives that had never been associated with his name. That’s grown into hate. Think I’m exaggerating? Google “hate Favre” and you will get 1,090,000 hits.
    How do you “hate” a man because he is indecisive- even irritatingly so? If he has the humility to joke about that character flaw, why can’t others? It is disgraceful how much joy is derived from this man’s pain and disingenuous how much his every success is mitigated. The next time you bloggers and commenters sit at your keyboards and decide to judge this man remember that one day your name may appear on someone’s media page and you may quickly become hated – then you can experience the fun first hand.
    By all accounts Brett Favre is a devoted family man – according to his wife; a philanthropist – according to the millions of dollars he has raised and donated; a loyal friend – according to his team mates; and one of the best quarterbacks to ever throw a football. Those things as well as his perseverance and his refusal to crumble under the weight of all of this unwarranted hate - for me, that is his legacy… and Brett, I have never enjoyed a football season more. I guess if you can hate someone you’ve never met then you can certainly love someone you’ve never met. I am a fan who loves and appreciates you.

    Regina | 2010-01-27 - 12:24:42 PM (CDT)
  2. Favre wasn’t revered in the Packer locker room.
    His leadership was questioned. The players met with the GB brass and made their case to move forward with Rodgers.

    They did show "ounces" of loyalty because they made exceptions and would have welcomed Favre back in late March 2008, April 2008, May 2008 and June 2008. Pushing it into August was a non starter - considering Favre also had a sports hernia in Sept 2008.
    Favre was not thrown aside. Favre also went on Greta Van Sustren publicly aired his complaints. Probably not the best move, perhaps a verbal version of throwning across your body into the middle 1/3 of the field.

    Business relationships are two way streets. He was treated well and paid very very well for his services.

    A devoted family man? He had his share of ill advised decisions there as well.

    Packers Insider | 2010-01-27 - 04:04:00 PM (CDT)
  3. I think that is inexcusable the way Farve has been treated in Wisconsin(where I live). I think that he should
    go into the Hall of Fame as a Viking. They have given him the respect he deserves. He beat the Packers twice and the Vikings went farther in the playoffs.

    Sue | 2010-01-27 - 11:27:23 PM (CDT)
  4. If you’re going to say that Favre had his best season with the Vikings in the 09/10 season then you’re admitting that he’s just a statistics QB now.

    I’m sorry, but winning the Super Bowl (and getting to the Super Bowl) is more important than interception/TD ratios. And it’s really stupid to think otherwise.

    Favre wanted to rub it into the Packers and the Packer Mgmt by saying that "this is the best team I’ve ever been on". Funny, the best team he ever been on pretty much ended the season the same way he ended his 2007 run. And then there’s the 2 trips to the Super Bowl - 1 win/ 1 loss.

    Sue is an idiot.
    Favre spent one season with the Vikings.
    He screwed the Packer fans over by going to the NUMBER ONE DIVISION RIVAL for no other reason than to stick it to the Packer Mgmt. That’s just dumb, because in 15 years no one is going to remember the names Ted Thompson and Mark Murphy.

    Favre did the Packers and the Packer fans no favors.

    Tim | 2010-01-27 - 01:49:40 AM (CDT)
  5. Regina said the following:

    " How many boxers have flirted, retired, and returned."

    Terrible example. Because in boxing YOU can dictate when your next fight is. If you don’t need the money or the ring experience.... you could take a whole year off if you want to.
    There’s only one person on your "team" in boxing - because only one person can get in the ring for you... YOU.

    Favre on the other hand was being a baby by wanting to quit then wanting to come back.
    Rodgers had a 3 year contract with the Packers when he signed as a rookie. If they would have let Favre play after retiring then they most certainly would have lost Rodgers. There was no way Rodgers was going to wait around another year - extending his contract with the Packers only to ride the bench some more while this Favre flipped back and forth over decisions.

    And you know what? They made the right choice. Because if you compare the two years as starters Rodgers blows Favre away statistically. And clearly you all care about simple stats - because so many are praising Favre for his "best season ever" despite not even getting to the Super Bowl and not even winning it.

    Tim | 2010-01-27 - 01:54:57 AM (CDT)
  6. the Packers take raw talent and develop it into prize quarterbacks......the Vikings shop for "droppings"......tells me alot!

    Wayne | 2010-01-28 - 11:50:07 AM (CDT)
  7. Packers lost!! ahhhh.....

    jim | 2010-01-29 - 03:33:10 PM (CDT)
  8. So did the Vikes!!!!!
    No Superbowl 40+ Years and counting. ahhhhhh

    Packers Insider | 2010-01-29 - 08:37:44 PM (CDT)
Your Thoughts,
Name: (required)
To protect everyone from terrible spam, please enter the following code: (required)
captcha
* Offensive comments will be deleted!
Our Print Edition Visit the Blogs Party Pix, OSU Sports, and Concerts Our current promotions Our current contest Campus Area drink calendar The One Event not to miss