.

U Weekly. Serving The Ohio State University in Columbus Ohio

Don't Miss

Bring On the Bacon

Uweekly Print

April 8th, 2009 Archives

Gee addresses conflict of interest

By Kate Liebers

http://www.petitiononline.com/mts2009/petition.html Notice Dr. Gee’s interview at the Lantern when the reporter asked "What acts of...
8 Comments + Add Yours

The Ohio State University President, Gordon Gee, just got a little greener, but he seems to have some soot on his fingertips.

Gee was selected to lead the Energy Initiative Advisory Committee in maximizing environment-friendly energy research at public universities. This position parallels Gee's support of Ohio State's "Scarlet, Gray and Green" efforts, yet as Gee sits on the board of Massey Energy coal-mining company, Gee could be less "green" and more "gray" than suspected.

Gee, however, denied a conflict of interest. He described his involvement with Massey Energy as a learning experience and an opportunity to affect change.

"Coal is one of our most important energy sources," said Gee as he expressed his interest in big energy issues.

Indeed, coal generates the majority of America's electricity, according to the U.S. Department of Energy.

According to the Union of Concerned Scientists, coal is also a contributor to greenhouse gases and the nation's single greatest contributor to air pollution.

Massey landed in hot water with environmental lawyers in 2008 for violating the Clean Water Act more than 4,500 times, according to the Environmental Protection Agency. Massey paid $20 million to resolve the issue-the largest civil penalty ever for a water permit violation.

"Massey itself, as with many coal companies, has had enormous challenges," said Gee, who has been on the company's board of directors since 2000. "I so happen to serve on the environmental policy committee," Gee explained, although Massey does not indicate this role in Gee's company bio.

"Massey has in many ways become a signature company in terms of its environmental policies," Gee continued. "And I'm proud of that."

According to Massey's Web site, the company focused on improving environmental performance in 2007. Since then, they have claimed a 36-percent reduction in citations from state regulatory agencies.

"If I can't make a difference on a board then I will not serve," said Gee, referring to the coal company. "In this instance, I have been a strong board member learning about energy and having an impact in terms of positive policy."

Influencing positive environmental policy is one mission of the Energy Initiative Advisory Committee, which the Association of Public and Land-grant Universities launched March 24.

Comprised of 15 universities, the committee seeks to tap innovative college students' research ideas to promote energy independence. One subcommittee-the Technical Group-is to advise policymakers on research issues after consulting universities, while the other subcommittee-the Advocacy Group-follows legislation to determine when public university's research interests can be presented to Congress.

APLU President Peter McPherson told the press that America's public research universities have had a significant role in the development of energy technologies. "Collectively, we can channel the way for making more of these contributions a reality," he said.

OSU students need to look no further than the Institute for Energy and the Environment (IEE) on campus to see these contributions taking form.

At the IEE, students have created the first electric vehicle to achieve 300 mph, as well as the first hydrogen fuel cell-powered vehicle, named Buckeye Bullet 1 and 2, respectively. The ChallengeX Team won third place in the competition to convert a gasoline-fueled car into a hybrid. Currently, the Solar Decathlon Team is building a solar-powered house outside the football stadium.

"Part of our role is to do the innovation here on campus, which then spills out into the general public," said IEE associate director Kate Bartter. "I think it's something to be proud of, that students at OSU understand the environment and the economy and want to be a part of the solution."

Architecture student Rob Hedge is one example. Now a graduate student working on the Solar Decathlon Team, Hedge reflected how OSU has changed since Gee became university president.

"When I was an undergrad in '06 I was very upset with the university because they didn't care about the environment," Hedge said. "However, now, with President Gee, that's changed."

Regarding Gee's position with Massey Energy, Hedge vouched for Gee being a "staunch supporter" of IEE projects.

"I would hope that President Gee, with his status on the board, is being influential and doing the right thing," Hedge said.

Originally Published: April 8, 2009

↑ Back to the top
 
Comments
  1. Gee can’t have it both ways. He needs to demonstrate specific reforms he’s pushed while on the Massey board, or he need to resign. Massey is a tremendously irresponsible company. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=O4Ym8qqR5vU

    Matthew Reitman | 2009-04-08 - 03:30:08 AM (CDT)
  2. Gee has repeatedly claimed he is making a difference and that it is better to make changes from within the camp than to complain outside of it. I wish he would come forward with all the significant changes he has made, instead of just repeating the corporate PR lines.

    Ben Becker | 2009-04-08 - 01:04:00 PM (CDT)
  3. It would be interesting to know the specifics on the "difference" President Gee has made in terms of Massey’s policies. Those things are, perhaps, ambiguous and hard to measure. However, the difference that Massey has made to President Gee is not at all hard to measure -- it is a matter of public record, and has amounted to several hundred thousand dollars. It’s great work if you can get it!! (By the way, does anyone know if the President reimburses the University for support services provided him in conjunction with his numerous corporate board appointments?

    Mark Stickle | 2009-04-09 - 11:18:00 AM (CDT)
  4. GG doesn’t party enough.

    Quincy | 2009-04-14 - 12:06:39 PM (CDT)
  5. I agree. Can Gee provide quantifiable evidence of his environmental efforts in regards to his role with Massey? In my view, the hundreds of violations Massey has committed since 2000 when he joined their Board are the only thing that speaks for his environmental record.

    Christine | 2009-04-14 - 08:07:43 PM (CDT)
  6. In the lawsuit United States Government v. Massey Energy Company, et al., Massey was cited for over 4,500 violations of the Clean Water Act from January 2000 to December 2006. Since these violations coincide with Gee’s tenure on the board it doesn’t appear that he’s had a positive impact, beyond providing the company some PR cover. I’d like to hear from him about what actions he has taken to change Massey’s policies.

    Jonathan | 2009-04-15 - 01:44:52 PM (CDT)
  7. He should be ashamed of himself. He is party to a genocide.

    Jerry | 2009-04-15 - 06:04:01 PM (CDT)
  8. http://www.petitiononline.com/mts2009/petition.html
    Notice Dr. Gee’s interview at the Lantern when the reporter asked "What acts of legislation or actual policies have you been a part of?" when questioning his influence on Massey. His response: to fidget a lot, stutter, and then talk about the multitude of awards Massey has received. What awards are these? Awards that come from the U.S. Office of Surface Mining Reclamation and Enforcement. Isn’t that like the mafia giving out a best hit man award? Oh yeah, Massey’s website only sites 4 awards, one of which Massey itself gives to one of its subsidiaries.

    Kate | 2009-04-16 - 06:04:45 PM (CDT)
Your Thoughts,
Name: (required)
To protect everyone from terrible spam, please enter the following code: (required)
captcha
* Offensive comments will be deleted!
Our Print Edition Visit the Blogs Party Pix, OSU Sports, and Concerts Our current promotions Our current contest Campus Area drink calendar The One Event not to miss