.

U Weekly. Serving The Ohio State University in Columbus Ohio

Don't Miss

Bring On the Bacon

Uweekly Print

April 29th, 2009 Archives

Dogs used for cardiology research; PETA has heart attack

By Nick Bechtel

How could I adopt dogs that are no longer useful to the study?
8 Comments + Add Yours

A group of demonstrators held a funeral procession last Saturday in memory of The Ohio State University's laboratory animals that died during research. The memorial - part of the national World Laboratory Animal Liberation Week - focused on four supposed research-related injustices, the most recent being George Billman's research involving dogs.

People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals, a non-profit known for their extreme animal activism, criticized OSU physiology and cell biology professor Dr. George Billman of abusing dogs during his cardiovascular research.

PETA claimed Billman's experiments involve surgically implanting an adjustable cuff around a dog's artery. According to PETA, while the dog runs on a treadmill, the cuff is tightened as to induce a heart attack.

Consequently, PETA called on the U.S. Department of Agriculture, and the National Institute of Health's Office of Laboratory Animal Welfare to investigate. PETA said the experiment did not make the effort to minimize pain, provide adequate veterinary care, nor euthanizing animals in "extreme distress," - all if which, PETA stated, are federal regulation violations.

Billman denied PETA's accusations. He said the experiments have been reviewed by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee and approved by the University Laboratory Animal Resources.

"The health and well-being of the animals in any study performed at the Ohio State University is closely monitored by board-certified veterinarians," Billman said. "The level of care is comparable to that received by patients in the University Hospitals."

Even so, Dr. Alka Chandna, senior researcher at PETA, said the experiments were redundant.

"You can go to a grade school and look in their textbook and you're going to see that exercise is good for your heart," Chandna said. "And I know, 20 years ago, I was going to nutrition talks where people were talking about omega-3 fatty acids. These pieces of knowledge already exist."

Yet Earle Holland, assistant vice president for research communications at Ohio State, called PETA's claims, "misrepresented and severely discounted."

"This is not an exercise project," Holland clarified. The experiment was aimed at understanding why the omega-3 fatty acids are good for the body at the cellular and biochemical level. While the omega-3 fatty acids have been thought to combat heart disease, the research probed the possibilities of ailing heart abnormalities.

Essentially, as Holland explained, the research "led to widespread clinical use in identifying people who are at the greatest risk of sudden death from certain heart problems."

Yet, central Ohio animal watch group, Protect Our Earth's Treasures, want to see OSU veer away from animal-involved experimentation. Demonstrators were invited to Saturday's memorial service at Wiseman Hall, where many animal surgical models are kept.

Robin Russell, director of POET, found the four violations of the Animal Welfare Act that PETA mentioned in the release.

While Billman was unavailable for comment, Holland said POET's claims are "totally inaccurate."

"The watchdog committees, the IACUC, is mandated by federal law at every institution or otherwise that uses animals in research," Holland said. "All institutions must follow a guide... that governs the use of all laboratory animals in research. It's more or less a Bible that has to be followed. And, of course, we follow religiously."

But POET has kept an eye on other OSU experiments. John Buford was criticized for his research involving restraining primates. Other OSU researchers have been accused of cruelty for giving methamphetamines to cats to test how the drug reacts to FIV, a virus similar virus to HIV. Stroke tests on rats and mice have also raised the brows of the central Ohio animal-rights activists.

Russell identified himself as a realist and acknowledged the unlikelihood that all animal experiments would stop. But the "ultimate goal," he said, "would be that Billman would go find something else to do and he wouldn't be killing dogs."

Both sides seem to be at a standstill for now. Holland referred to the issue as a "non-story," while PETA waits to see if their request for further investigation is requested.

Originally Published: April 29, 2009

↑ Back to the top
 
Comments
  1. Thanks for your story on OSU animal research. Funny headline, by the way. Sad topic, though.

    Earle Holland can always be relied upon to belittle the opposition to the research department’s often cruel and unnecessary projects. Well, that’s what he gets paid to do. He reminds me a bit of Karl Rove. How can anyone believe his opinions?

    A few years ago, OSU was making cats fatally ill and shooting them up with methamphetamine to learn why meth was bad for people with AIDS. That experiment is over now, and OSU is millions richer.

    Now OSU has a new cats-on-meth experiment. It’s to learn why the anti-AIDS drug AZT is not as effective in patients who use meth. Millions more for OSU

    These are federal dollars. This is how the government spends that part of our taxes devoted to AIDS research. I’ve complained to the government and to Gordon Gee, who just touts OSU’s national standing in research dollars attracted, which is how research schools are rated -- by dollars, not discoveries.

    OSU is known for it’s backward attitude towards animals, best exemplified by its refusal to replace animals with alternatives, such as the medical mannequins used instead of animals at other universities.

    Lee Williams | 2009-04-29 - 07:49:15 PM (CDT)
  2. Thank you for calling attention to this subject. I appreciate the effort you put into making this article well-done and balanced.

    Yes, Holland has a history of minimalism when it comes to people raising concerns about animal use at OSU. In regards to our demonstration Saturday he claims that we were "noted by barely 20 passers-by," when in reality there were around 100 fliers given out and several passers-by voiced their support. I sincerely hope Holland’s attitude of ignoring the concerns of tax-payers is not indicative of the way problems are addressed at OSU.

    It is heart breaking to think about what these poor animals have to go through. It is even more heart breaking that there will be no benefit from this research to people with cardiovascular disease or AIDS due to the vast differences between each species. OSU needs to focus on research that produces results instead of papers in medical journals.

    Thank you again for this story.

    Melissa | 2009-04-29 - 08:48:03 PM (CDT)
  3. "You can go to a grade school and look in their textbook and you’re going to see that exercise is good for your heart". Any reader with a brain between his/her ears (instead of lettuce) can tell this kind of statement from PeTA is nothing but a mis-representation of scientific research. Don’t waste your time publicizing the stunts of these people. We have better things to do.

    Denis | 2009-04-29 - 09:06:27 PM (CDT)
  4. The Frankenstein experiment carried out by torturers (the scientists in their pristine White Coats, like Nazis) are unspeakably cruel, barbaric and downright WRONG! Could the masses/the public possibly ask themselves, "How could this be? When an individual abuses animals in this manner, they would be arrested and prosecuted." But these lofty placed torturers purposely blind, maim, inject animals with man’s diseases, break bones and insert objects in the helpless bodies of defenseless animals. Torturing MANS BEST FRIEND is unforgivable. Scum bags - laboratories are where the real terrorist reside.

    Tia Stern | 2009-04-29 - 09:13:06 PM (CDT)
  5. Tia...So your saying scientists are worse than the people that purposely target and blow up other human beings?

    Jordan Hoewischer | 2009-04-30 - 03:06:38 PM (CDT)
  6. Contrary to Earle Holland’s contention that animal experimentation “is closely monitored” in the U.S., there is only one federal law in the U.S.—the Animal Welfare Act (AWA)—that provides protection for animals in laboratories. According to multiple federal audits, even this law, which deals mainly with caging and husbandry issues, is not being adequately enforced, and it entirely excludes rats, mice, and birds. A scathing 2005 audit published by the U.S. Department of Agriculture’s Office of the Inspector General (OIG) reports that laboratories view fines for AWA violations not as a penalty for causing pain and suffering to animals but as a “cost of conducting business.”

    The OIG audit further notes that Institutional Animal Care and Use Committees (IACUC)—oversight committees that are charged with evaluating proposed experiments and ensuring that laws and regulations are followed—are failing to carry out their responsibilities. As a result, sick animals go without veterinary care, animals used in invasive surgeries do not receive sufficient pain relief, and extremely sick animals are denied humane euthanasia. An astounding 29 percent—nearly a third—of oversight committees are failing to ensure that experimenters have looked for alternatives to painful procedures on animals, as they’re required to do. This lies at the heart of PETA’s concerns regarding George Billman’s experiments, which have spanned 27 years and include - contrary to Holland’s contention - experiments on dogs that concluded that exercise strengthens the heart.

    Animals in laboratories endure lives of deprivation, isolation, stress, trauma and depression even before they are used in any experiment. When billions of taxpayer dollars are funneled into these experiments, the public has a right to expect that animals will, at the very least, be given the minimal protections conveyed by the AWA. The failure of IACUCs to ensure that this modicum of humane treatment is applied results in immense suffering for animals used in sometimes painful, often distressful, and ultimately lethal experiments. Readers who would like to learn more can visit stopanimaltests.com. For free stickers and information on what you can do to help, visit peta2.com.

    Alka Chandna | 2009-05-04 - 11:49:24 AM (CDT)
  7. I find it sad that OSU is sticking to such outdated methods. The animals aren’t the only ones paying - people pay too when real medical advancements are delayed by this nonsense.

    J. Coolman | 2009-05-05 - 02:33:40 PM (CDT)
  8. How could I adopt dogs that are no longer useful to the study?

    Marilyn | 2009-09-18 - 12:08:45 PM (CDT)
Your Thoughts,
Name: (required)
To protect everyone from terrible spam, please enter the following code: (required)
captcha
* Offensive comments will be deleted!
Our Print Edition Visit the Blogs Party Pix, OSU Sports, and Concerts Our current promotions Our current contest Campus Area drink calendar The One Event not to miss