Today's deals?
Sign-In

STORY

Share

Money woes lead to Lantern concerns for OSU

[24 Comment(s)]

By Lisa Scott

Newspapers are in trouble. Reports show the industry has been in a state of decline for a number of years, causing some to fear there will be a limited demand for print in the future.

According to a national survey conducted by the Pew Research Center for the People and Press, readership of newspapers has not increased in two years.

"This is the first time in roughly 15 years that fewer than half of all Americans report reading a daily paper on a regular basis."

Here at home, the trend is all too evident.

The Lantern, Ohio State's student newspaper, announced it would cease production during the summer months in order to prevent the paper from losing money — losses which the paper itself projects at over $150,000 for this year.

Dan McDonald, professor in the School of Communication, said the reason for the paper's summer hiatus was strictly financial and had nothing to do with low readership.

According to the Lantern, circulation for the paper decreased approximately 50 percent over the past two years, moving from 28,000 to 15,000.

The drop in circulation stemmed from an increase in the amount of daily returns on the paper, which sometimes exceeded 10 percent.

"At that time, college officials said we needed to either cut personnel or newsprint, so we decided to cut newsprint first to reduce the loss in revenue," said Ray Catalino, former Business Manager for the Lantern.

The cuts saved the paper approximately $25,000 annually; however, that method was only a temporary fix to the financial problem.

The next option presented was cutting the summer edition — a decision that was opposed by much of the Lantern's professional staff.

According to previous statements to the Lantern, Catalino said he thinks two things will result from the summer cut: producing a smaller newspaper or losing it completely.

Alternative plans were proposed to the School of Communication in January, but officials were said to be unreceptive.

Further, even if cutting the summer paper might save money, it could cost the paper advertising revenue during the academic year, Catalino said

"The Lantern's absence will just benefit other publications," he said. "Papers like UWeekly have already gained a few of the advertisers that we can't satisfy, particularly because we don't have a summer publication."

Based upon the current state of the paper, many say they are concerned about its presence on the OSU campus.

"[The Lantern] seems to be going in the direction of extinction," he said. "How and if someone changes the current business model will determine the future of the paper."

However, McDonald said that the current situation should not warrant much concern.

"If you look at the Lantern, it's got a 125 year history, and it's done all sorts of things," he said. "During WWII it was an afternoon paper with an all female staff. It's gone through periods where it was a weekly and periods where it was a monthly…It's just at another point in history where it changes."

Cutbacks lead to mass resignation and money woes

Change will definitely take place this upcoming year as the paper enters fall quarter with a new advisor, student editorial staff, and even a new professional team.

The summer cut has had a domino effect on many aspects of the paper, but one of the most unexpected was the mass resignation of the Lantern business staff.

"They thought they could save money by having all of us not working during the summer," Catalino said. "It was decided that we would all end our jobs in June and start back in September…and they would be saving 25 percent from our salaries."

However, plans turned sour when seven members of the Lantern business staff — approximately 75 percent — decided they would not return for the upcoming school year, placing the paper in yet another financial slump.

Catalino says the paper is now losing more money than before because they must now pay severance to the former workers for at least several months.

Tom O' Hara, the newly appointed Director of News and Operations, said this should not prove to be a problem. He said most of the staff had been replaced and the issues are being resolved through ongoing initiatives.

"We're going to have a larger student sales staff, so we're going to try to generate more revenue than we have in the past, just simply by being more aggressive on our sales efforts."

It's all on the web

Newspaper circulation is falling across the country. In the age of the internet many papers are finding it hard to capture and maintain readers, particularly because today's generation is living fast-paced and hi-tech lifestyles. By allowing readers access to breaking news and interactive features, the web is luring in advertisers and former fans of print.

"We used to have, like, five different newspapers in our dorm. They were free, but people didn't really pick them up," said Amber Ballard. "If we want to find out something we just read the paper online."

So what does this mean for the Lantern?

O' Hara said it means more time will be put into developing the online edition of the paper.

The Lantern has employed a new online editor and an assistant online editor for the upcoming school year, and hopes to improve the quality of that medium.

"We're going to devote a little more resources to getting stories up quicker on the online edition," he said.

However, Catalino believes this further proves his point that the Lantern, in its paper form, will cease to exist in the near future.

"I think the goal of the school of communication is to eliminate the Lantern entirely from print and convert it to an electronic form. The problem with that — as I view it — is you can't generate money with just an electronic product."

Appealing to student interests

O'Hara said he doesn't believe cutting the summer paper will affect the student reaction to the Lantern this fall, and believes students will resume their previous relationship with the paper when school begins.

"There are about 50,000 students from September to May, and only 10,000 during the summer," O' Hara said. "When the campus is crawling with students again, they'll be as eager to pick up the Lantern as they were before, particularly because they weren't even here during the summer when the boxes were empty."

However, although the Lantern is known as the student voice of OSU, many students feel it doesn't appeal to students' interests.

"I don't really read the Lantern that often, because it doesn't really interest me," said junior Ryan Peoples. "It's kind of boring sometimes, because it just has a lot of stuff about student government and formal business stuff."

O' Hara said these issues will be addressed this year, and he hopes the quality of the Lantern will be significantly higher in the upcoming school year.

"The Lantern does substantial basic coverage of the university governmental structure and the police, but I'd like to lighten it up a little and have a little more fun with what really interests a large number of the student body," he said. "It's not our intention to turn it into a tabloid; we want to do high quality serious work, but also want it to make it more entertaining."

Journalism at Ohio State

Due to issues that have risen throughout the journalism program since the loss of accreditation in 2000, some now have a wayward perspective on what the program has and will become.

"There is some misperception of what's going on in the journalism program, and we're looking at the curriculum this year for some potential signs of change in it," McDonald said.

However, many say that students — and the Lantern — should not have to suffer. Steve Wartenberg, a former Advisor for the Lantern, said that if the program is open to more students the Lantern will get better.

"They desperately need to get students taking courses as freshmen. By keeping them waiting until they're juniors it makes it really difficult to get clips for internships in time, and they're usually at a huge disadvantage to journalism students at other schools," said Steve Wartenberg, former Lantern Advisor.

"They need less of these theory courses on communication and more actual journalism writing classes, where students write more and do more multimedia things."

O' Hara said this issue is being addressed, and that the Lantern is working to recruit as aggressively as possible to get more people into the program and onto the staff.

"We've been talking about making it easier to get into the practicum class," he said. "Before there were a lot of prerequisites and we're thinking about waiving a lot of them."

However, despite obstacles, OSU journalism students have persevered, and many say their efforts are what have kept the paper alive.

"Other than this summer, I have to give a lot of credit to the editors; that despite a lot of obstacles, I think they've really, really worked hard. Took a lot of pride and put out a really good product," said Wartenberg.

"I mean every quarter you start off with a brand new staff of 45 who have absolutely no experience, and the editors do an amazing job of helping prepare those students and get the paper out."

Originally Published: Issue 664 - August 20, 2008

Share on Facebook
Back to the top

Comments

  1. Great article. I was wondering what was going on with the Lantern and was curious to see if it would return this Fall, but it doesnt look like good times are ahead for the paper.

    OSU reader | 2008-08-19 - 08:17:30 PM (CDT)
  2. surprisingly unbiased and informative article. nice job uweekly!

    Lantern fan | 2008-08-19 - 12:38:05 AM (CDT)
  3. It is hard to take what ray catalino seriously -- sounds like the man got fired and is spewing nothing but sour grapes. I’d take what he says with a grain of salt. As former business manager, it doesn’t sound like he did a very good job of running the lantern. U-Weekly has to be licking their chops -- are you a competitor to the Lantern?

    Big Lantern Fan | 2008-08-20 - 10:25:10 AM (CDT)
  4. Ray Catalino wasn’t the problem -- he ran the business side as best he could. The the root of the problem was alluded to by Steve Wartenberg -- because of the structure of the journalsim program, the content of the paper didn’t make it attractive to advertisers. Carroll Glynn, this McDonald joker the rest of the Comm School are intentionally suffocating The Lantern. When the largest university in the United States is without a student newspaper, ultimately they’ll be to blame. Congrats.

    By the way, how can the business director and the director of news be the same person? Talk about a conflict of interest. Good luck guys.

    sw | 2008-08-20 - 11:08:41 AM (CDT)
  5. ummm... The above comment was signed by "SW" --- could that be Steve Wartenberg? (He writes like a disgruntled ex-employee.)

    Penelope | 2008-08-20 - 11:51:50 AM (CDT)
  6. "Other than this summer, I have to give a lot of credit to the editors..."

    Wow, what a nice dig at the student editors of the summer Lantern. Good to see former employees are supportive of their former students.

    Tim Heidecker | 2008-08-20 - 12:30:15 PM (CDT)
  7. No paper this summer, Tim

    Ellis | 2008-08-20 - 12:44:58 PM (CDT)
  8. uweekly = online source moreso
    the lantern = physical read

    Reed | 2008-08-20 - 01:19:24 PM (CDT)
  9. Carroll Glynn and her (bitch/ex-husband) McDonald, along with her boyfriend Tommy Conrad stripped Ray Catalino of any and all authority bit by bit over the last several years to the point where the purchase of a highlighter required their prior approval. The financial slide the Lantern went on is due to no other than THEIR decisions. Any (EVERY) proposal put forth to them to increase revenue was shot down before it was even discussed. They were on a mission to destroy the Lantern, and the fatal blow has been sstruck.
    R.I.P. the Lantern.
    I agree not only with ’sw’ in their opinion of O’Hara’s dual role, but also find it another example of their utter incompetence that they would hire a BUSINESS director who has absolutely NO BUSINESS experience. The Lantern has at most one quarter left in it after the financial beatdown they’re about to suffer caused by Glynn & Co.’s uninformed decisions.

    CG <3’sTC | 2008-08-20 - 02:46:05 PM (CDT)
  10. Yikes... it DOES sound like bitter ex-employee...

    Yikes | 2008-08-20 - 04:01:25 PM (CDT)
  11. This is like a college newspaper soap opera, so exciting!
    I need some popcorn ...

    Eric Wareheim | 2008-08-20 - 04:07:39 PM (CDT)
  12. wow! Number 9 sure has some rage issues. This person really sounds like a disgruntled ex-employee.

    Smokin’ | 2008-08-20 - 04:11:08 PM (CDT)
  13. Want to know what’s really going on? How about asking the SOURCE.

    Carroll Glynn

    I guess that would’ve been too easy?

    Lantern Editor (2004-06) | 2008-08-20 - 05:27:26 PM (CDT)
  14. oh shiiiiit!!! hahaha this is hilarious. guess lantern peeps read uweekly and vice versa. oh buddy!

    crackinup | 2008-08-20 - 05:29:04 PM (CDT)
  15. I used to be a Journalism major...but I’ve switched and this article proves why I made that decision. It’s cuthroat and ridiculous to have to deal with these issues in a career you’re supposed to love and enjoy doing. No thanks!

    LawStudent | 2008-08-21 - 10:46:48 AM (CDT)
  16. #4 and 9 are right on! Glynn and Conrad are quite a "team". What they have done to the Lantern and to the Journalism program at OSU is inexcusable. Its time for the School of Communication to look for new leadership.

    gm | 2008-08-22 - 01:25:54 PM (CDT)
  17. You don’t have to be a bitter ex-employee to see the writing on the wall. The fact is there are many people who are leaving either The Lantern or the School of Communication due to Carroll Glynn and her dirty deed doing self. Many of the staff of The Lantern left for one simple reason - they could not and should not be expected to live on 75% of what they were making. If someone came in and told you, hey we are cutting your pay 25%, would you want to stay there? Additionally, during the past few years, good old Carroll has had a problem keeping her own staff on board - resigned Don Havard, resigned Donna Smith. Both of these individuals were her right hand fiscal person who had no control or authority to handle the fiscal operations because guess what, Carroll would not let them! I’m sure the dominos are not done falling in this soap opera saga. I’m sure the new GM/Advisor in his conflictory role won’t be around long when the paper continues losing money because of the lost advertisers to UWeekly, and he can’t stop the bleeding! The sad state that The Lantern has been driven into is not from everyone there trying - it’s because their hands have been tied to prevent them from doing so. If anyone really wants to know what is going on, why don’t they go to The Lantern and see how bad things are there with Carroll in control.

    Free the Lantern from Communciation! | 2008-08-25 - 04:37:26 PM (CDT)
  18. Trolls

    troll watch | 2008-08-26 - 10:45:44 AM (CDT)
  19. I have personally gone through OSU’s journalism program and served as an editor on The Lantern staff for five quarters.

    From my experience there, I believe the administration is moving the paper in the wrong direction and I voiced that opinion to them, hence why I am no longer part of the paper.

    UWeekly has now become the official paper of OSU and I don’t think that’s necessarily a bad thing - at least they are independent.

    Also - Steve Wartenberg was not forced out like most of the business people. He chose to leave and is now a business reporter at The Columbus Dispatch.

    Amanda D. | 2008-08-26 - 03:28:36 PM (CDT)
  20. A.D.,
    The subpar ’journalism’ education you received is evident in the way you misrepresented the facts in your comment. For the record, NO ONE was fired. They were all given the option of accepting an effective FORTY per cent pay cut through the first 15 months, from July 08 - Oct. 09, which then became a 25% pay cut from then on, OR, to accept severance packages of varying length. The "business people" CHOSE to decline that insulting offer - not FIRED like "an editor on The Lantern staff for five quarters." It didn’t take much deductive reasoning for the "business people" to realize that the Lantern wouldn’t even have survived long enough to ever reach Oct. 09 - that comes with an understanding of how a "business" is supposed to work. That knowledge is now gone for good. It is the opinion of most, if not all, that the horrible product the Lantern became during the ’last five quarters’ was directly the result of half-assed, incompetent leadership by the so-called editors. The countless typos, horrible grammar, and obviously thrown-together product that came out of that newsroom was an utter embarrassment. At least UWeekly could be found in the stalls of campus outhouses - the Lantern became so bad it was considered unsanitary to read even while squatting over a bowl of crap.

    X | 2008-08-27 - 02:51:16 PM (CDT)
  21. lisa do some real reporting. if i can recall i saw your byline in the lantern. then you fell off. then you were staff. then you fell off. again. now you’re here. you should have called the editor that got fired after five quarters as x said. or one of the business employees. or caroll, or dan. the list goes on. instead you half ass it and use work done by said editor fired after five quarters. you suck. uweekly sucks. lantern sucks now.

    osustudentxyz | 2008-08-28 - 09:13:11 PM (CDT)
  22. looks like uweekly is slackin! no new topics for more than a week now...for shame!

    disappointed | 2008-09-02 - 03:41:42 PM (CDT)
  23. UWeekly is on hiatus until 9/17.

    Pedro | 2008-09-02 - 04:30:37 PM (CDT)
  24. The problem with the Lantern is that no one bothers to actually make sure the articles are well-written.

    The administration has nothing at all to do with that -- maybe if whoever was overseeing the paper and its editors was a little more careful about the actual quality of the paper, there wouldn’t have had to be so many drastic changes.

    poopsmcgee | 2008-09-17 - 05:54:01 PM (CDT)
Your Thoughts,
Name: (required)
To protect everyone from terrible spam, please enter the following code: (required)
captcha
* Offensive comments will be deleted!

CURRENT CONTEST